by Sam Leigh | March 11, 2025
The U.S. labor market — as we’ve known it for the better part of a century — is being rapidly reshaped by Artificial Intelligence (AI). Recent waves of layoffs — especially in tech — have coincided with a surge in AI adoption and automation investments. At the same time, fears of an economic downturn have driven corporate cost-cutting, even as companies pour resources into AI development. Many displaced workers are turning to gig work, consulting, or content creation as alternative income streams. The following analysis examines how AI-driven layoffs, recession concerns, shifting market dynamics, and the rise of the gig economy are impacting employment — and what the coming years might hold for jobs, economic stability, and policy responses in the United States.
AI’s Impact on Job Losses Across Key Industries
Technology: The tech sector has seen unprecedented job cuts, partly due to AI. In 2024 alone, over 130,000 tech jobs were eliminated across 457 companies. Firms like Microsoft and Google announced major layoffs while simultaneously investing heavily in AI (e.g. Microsoft’s $10 billion OpenAI investment). Industry observers note that these layoffs have multiple causes — economic uncertainty and waning demand — but the tech industry’s intense focus on AI is a key factor. Even software engineers are affected; employees without AI-related skills risk slower wage growth or job loss as companies prioritize AI expertise. One survey found 37% of companies using AI had already reduced workers in 2023 because AI made certain roles redundant, and 44% note AI-driven layoffs in 2024. In short, no tech position is entirely safe from automation, and even well-paid white-collar roles are being re-evaluated in light of AI advancements
Automotive: Automation has long impacted manufacturing jobs, and this is accelerating in the auto industry. In 2024, slowing sales of both gas and electric vehicles led automakers to scale back production and cut staff. Layoffs hit factory workers and engineers alike as companies sought to align workforce size with cooling demand. At the same time, the push toward electric vehicles (EVs) and smarter factories means fewer assembly-line workers may be needed in the future (EVs have fewer parts, and AI-driven robotics handle more tasks). Tesla, for example, announced a 10% workforce reduction in 2024 (about 14,000 jobs) amid cost pressures. In the longer term, AI and robotics could displace many routine manufacturing roles — a study by MIT found that for each robot added per 1,000 workers, employment-to-population ratios fall and wages dip, highlighting how industrial automation erodes factory jobs over time. While auto layoffs in 2024 were driven by market conditions, ongoing automation will likely keep blue-collar employment under pressure.
Finance: Banks and financial services are increasingly leveraging AI for everything from customer service chatbots to algorithmic trading. Wall Street is bracing for significant job cuts as AI tools mature. Global banks could shed up to 200,000 roles (about 3% of their workforce) within 3–5 years due to AI adoption. Back-office, middle-office, and customer service roles are most at risk as routine processes become automated. In fact, over half of all jobs in banking have high potential for automation — the highest of any industry. U.S. finance giants are already piloting AI: JPMorgan uses AI in risk management and client services, so far to “augment” staff rather than replace them. But that balance may shift as generative AI improves. Bank executives acknowledge that certain entry-level roles (like analysts parsing financial models or call-center reps) may be trimmed in favor of AI systems. Even major banks in Asia are moving this direction — for example, DBS (Singapore’s largest bank) plans 4,000 AI-related job cuts over three yeas. The expectation is a leaner financial workforce with AI boosting productivity and profits (Bloomberg Intelligence estimates AI could lift banks’ profits ~15% by 2027). In sum, finance is using AI to automate many support functions, which will likely shrink headcounts in roles like compliance, customer support, and data entry while increasing demand for AI-savvy financial analysts and engineers.
Healthcare: Healthcare has so far experienced more augmentation than outright AI-driven layoffs, but changes are underway. AI is streamlining many administrative and diagnostic tasks — for example, automating appointment scheduling, medical coding, and even initial image analysis — which could reduce the need for certain support staff. A recent survey found that 28% of healthcare employees saw layoffs in the past year, and 18% of healthcare managers blamed AI integration for those cuts. These AI-related cuts likely hit roles like medical billers or transcriptionists where algorithms can perform efficiently. However, in 70% of workplaces that adopted AI, staffing levels didn’t shrink — instead, AI boosted efficiency while staff stayed in place. Many experts believe AI will augment doctors and nurses rather than replace them, at least in the near term. For example, AI diagnostic tools can help radiologists by flagging images, but a human radiologist still makes final decisions — thus one possibility is slower job growth in fields like radiology, not an immediate wipeout of jobs. In fact, healthcare faces labor shortages (e.g. nursing) as demand rises with an aging population, so AI is being deployed to fill gaps and reduce burnout rather than simply to cut costs. Overall, healthcare’s AI impact is mixed: some administrative roles may be trimmed, yet clinical roles are more likely to be augmented, with AI taking over tedious tasks and freeing humans for patient care. This is reflected in the data — despite AI’s emergence, healthcare employment has continued to grow in areas like home health, nursing care, and hospitals (46,000 new jobs added in one recent month). Thus, near-term job losses from AI in healthcare remain limited, but the workforce is evolving as routine tasks become automated.
Macroeconomic Landscape: Cost-Cutting, Investment, and Recession Fears
The broader economic backdrop is crucial to understanding these workforce shifts. Coming into 2024, many firms were belt-tightening in anticipation of a potential recession, even as inflation eased slightly. The Federal Reserve’s aggressive interest rate hikes in 2022–2023 (a cumulative 5+ percentage point increase) slowed sectors like tech and real estate, and companies reacted by curbing expenses. Labor is often a company’s largest cost, so layoffs and hiring freezes became common “cost-cutting” strategies — indeed, “cost-cutting” was the number one reason given for U.S. job cuts in early 2024, accounting for over 73,000 announced layoffs. Corporate leaders aimed to protect profit margins amid higher borrowing costs and uncertain consumer demand.
At the same time, a paradox emerged: even as firms downsized, they were ramping up spending on AI and automation. Survey data shows 92% of companies plan to increase AI investment through 2025. Executives see AI as a long-term productivity booster, even if its short-term return is unclear. This led to the pattern noted above, where Big Tech simultaneously cut staff and funneled billions into AI projects. Companies essentially reallocated resources from labor to technology — workforce downsizing helped fund AI initiatives, which are seen as critical to future competitiveness. For example, Meta (Facebook’s parent) announced 10,000 layoffs in 2023 while proclaiming a strategic shift to focus on AI development. This trend shows up in surveys: one global CEO poll (PwC) found one in four CEOs expect generative AI to drive workforce reductions of at least 5% in their companies in 2024, illustrating that top leaders are actively planning around AI-driven cost savings. In short, many firms view AI not just as a tool but as a replacement for portions of the workforce, enabling leaner operations.
Recession anxiety in 2023 also played a big role. Though the U.S. economy did not ultimately fall into recession in 2023 (GDP growth stayed positive and unemployment remained low around 3.5–3.7%), there was widespread fear of a downturn. High inflation, rising interest rates, and global uncertainties (e.g. war in Ukraine, supply chain disruptions) created a cautious business climate. This prompted “preemptive” layoffs — companies cutting early just in case the economy soured. We saw historically low levels of new hiring plans in early 2024; U.S. employers announced the fewest April hiring intentions since 2013. Yet paradoxically, layoff rates overall stayed near record lows outside a few sectors, and job creation continued in services and other industries. This highlights a key macro dynamic: the highly publicized tech and white-collar layoffs were not indicative of the entire economy’s health, but rather a reallocation. Many laid-off workers found new jobs quickly, or shifted to gig/freelance roles, keeping unemployment low. Indeed, over 2.2 million jobs were added to the U.S. economy in 2024 despite the downsizing headlines, underscoring underlying labor market resilience.
Overall, the macro landscape is one of companies striving to boost efficiency and cut costs amid uncertainty. AI is viewed as a solution for efficiency gains, leading to trends of “do more with less (people)”. Meanwhile, the Federal Reserve’s policies and recession worries have tempered excessive hiring. The result is that many businesses are restructuring — streamlining operations via automation, consolidating roles, and reducing headcount — to navigate an economy where growth has slowed from the post-pandemic boom but hasn’t collapsed. This cautious stance may persist until there’s clarity on inflation and growth. If recession fears abate, hiring could pick up again; if not, companies will continue balancing between investing in technology and holding down labor costs to weather any storm.
The Rise of Gig Work, Consulting, and Content Monetization
One major response to these employment shifts has been a boom in non-traditional work. The gig economy is absorbing many workers seeking flexibility or new income after layoffs. By 2023, an estimated 64 million Americans (38% of the workforce) participated in some form of freelance or gig work. This ranges from driving for ride-share or delivery apps, to contracting as a software developer, to freelance graphic design or writing. The trend has been accelerated by both worker preferences and employer strategies. On the employer side, companies facing uncertain markets increasingly hire contractors instead of full-time staff, to stay agile and control costs. On the worker side, many professionals see gig/freelance roles as a chance to diversify income and maintain work-life balance — benefits a traditional 9-to-5 might not offer. Notably, the gig economy continued growing even amid an “iffy” economic outlook, leading some to ask if it is recession-proof. Projections suggest that by 2025, as much as half of the U.S. workforce could engage in gig work in some capacity, a remarkable shift in labor patterns.
Expert consulting and “fractional” roles are on the rise as well. Many laid-off white-collar workers — for example, tech managers or financial analysts — have transitioned into offering their expertise on a contract or project basis. This can mean working as an independent consultant for multiple clients, or taking short-term “fractional” executive positions (such as a part-time CMO or CFO for a startup). Data shows the number of high-earning independents is increasing: in 2024, about 4.7 million Americans working independently earned over $100,000, up from 3 million in 2020. This suggests that a significant share of skilled talent is opting for self-employment or consulting, likely drawn by the autonomy and the demand for specialized skills on a flexible basis. Companies benefit by tapping these experts as needed without carrying permanent salaries. In effect, the job market is becoming more fluid — instead of a full-time job for one employer, a professional might juggle multiple gigs or clients. Freelancers contributed an estimated $1.27 trillion to the U.S. economy in 2023 through their work, underscoring how much economic activity has shifted to independent work.
Content creation and monetization has also emerged as a livelihood for many in the post-pandemic era. With digital platforms enabling individuals to reach large audiences, more people are earning income as creators — via podcasts, YouTube channels, newsletters, online courses, and social media influencing. This “creator economy” overlaps with the gig economy, providing another outlet for displaced workers or those seeking supplemental income. For instance, laid-off journalists or marketers might launch paid newsletters; engineers might start programming tutorial channels. The influencer marketing industry is booming, projected to reach $32.5 billion globally by 2025 as brands channel advertising budgets to online creators. Similarly, online coaching and expert knowledge-sharing (e.g. paid one-on-one Zoom consultations or subscription content) is expected to grow robustly (a projected $11.7B market by 2032). These trends indicate that many workers are monetizing their skills and passions directly rather than through traditional employers. Platforms like Substack, Patreon, and TikTok provide the infrastructure for individuals to earn income from content creation. While only a minority achieve high earnings, a growing number make a modest living this way or use it to supplement other work. The recent layoffs actually fueled this movement: for example, some ex-tech employees started popular blogs or YouTube channels sharing industry insights, turning unemployment into an opportunity to build a personal brand.
Gig work’s appeal has proven especially strong for younger workers. Surveys find that a large share of Gen Z and Millennials value gig flexibility; 43% of Gen Z and 47% of Millennials say schedule flexibility (like gig jobs offer) is a top priority, even more so than older generations. Additionally, 3 in 4 Americans under 45 believe that flexible gig workers will eventually drive the U.S. economy as a whole. This sentiment aligns with the idea that the traditional employment model is shifting. Gig platforms have made it easy to find short-term work, which has “democratized” access to income — anyone with a car can drive for Uber, anyone with internet can freelance online. This flexibility was invaluable during economic turbulence, and indeed gig work continued to flourish even when full-time job postings slowed. The gig economy’s total global transactions were about $455 billion in 2023 and climbing, reflecting worldwide growth.
In summary, the rise of the gig and creator economies represents a structural shift in how people earn a living. Driving forces include: corporate preference for variable labor costs, workers’ desire for autonomy, and enabling technologies/platforms. As traditional employment becomes less stable (due to layoffs or rapid skill cycles), workers are proactively creating diversified careers. Going forward, we can expect a larger proportion of the workforce to be freelancers, consultants, or independent creators — which has implications for benefits, job security, and how we measure employment. Notably, this shift raises questions about safety nets, since gig workers lack traditional employer-provided benefits. It also challenges companies to manage a more fluid talent pool. The economy is adapting: for example, financial institutions are offering new products for independent earners, and policymakers are debating how to extend labor protections to gig workers (more on that in a later section).
Projections for 2025 and Beyond: AI’s Influence on Jobs and Economic Stability
Looking ahead, experts agree that AI will be a dominant force shaping the future of work. However, there is debate on the net outcome — mass unemployment or new prosperity? Most forecasts predict significant job displacement and job creation over the next decade, with the net effect dependent on policy and business responses.
By 2025, we will likely see continued automation of routine tasks across industries. Generative AI’s rapid advancement in 2023–2024 (through models like GPT-4, etc.) means more jobs can partially be done by AI. One analysis found 80% of the U.S. workforce could have at least 10% of their tasks impacted by large language models and other AI, and nearly 20% of workers might see >50% of their duties affected. In the near term, this translates to humans working alongside AI — for instance, a marketing specialist might use AI to generate first drafts, allowing them to handle more campaigns at once (doing the work that might have required two people before). So rather than immediate widespread unemployment, 2024–2025 will likely feature AI augmenting many jobs, changing skill requirements. Indeed, a McKinsey study of the U.S. predicts that high-skill roles (STEM, creative, legal, etc.) will be enhanced by generative AI, not eliminated, in the short run. The biggest job losses by 2025 are expected in roles that are highly routine: data entry clerks, administrative assistants, customer service reps, and similar positions are at high risk. The World Economic Forum’s analysis projects that by 2025, AI and automation could replace 85 million jobs worldwide, particularly in those clerical and repetitive roles, but create 97 million new jobs (in tech, green sectors, care, etc.) — a net gain globally. We are already seeing this churn: for example, many companies have stopped hiring in data entry or basic admin roles because AI tools can handle those tasks, even as they add jobs for data analysts or AI engineers.
Zooming out to 2030 (the end of this decade), the scale of change becomes clearer. The World Economic Forum’s Future of Jobs 2025 report (surveying over 1,000 companies) forecasts that 170 million new jobs will be created and 92 million eliminated globally by 2030, yielding a net +78 million jobs (about +14% growth). These new jobs will emerge from trends like tech expansion (AI, big data, engineering roles), the green transition (renewable energy jobs, etc.), and societal shifts (care economy, education). Importantly, the displaced jobs will be concentrated in certain functions: “roles will be displaced by these same trends” — meaning administrative and assembly-line jobs declining, while roles like data analysts, AI specialists, software developers, and green energy technicians surge. For instance, WEF notes the single largest job growth category through 2030 will be agricultural and farm workers (driven by climate adaptation and food demand), and other top growth roles include delivery drivers, tech developers, and construction workers. On the declining side, data entry, secretarial, accounting clerks, and factory workers top the list of losses. So the labor market in 2030 will have a different composition, but not necessarily a smaller size.
In the United States, McKinsey projects that by 2030, activities accounting for up to 30% of hours worked in the U.S. could be automated across the economy. This could displace millions of workers if done rapidly. However, McKinsey emphasizes that generative AI is likely to augment many professional jobs rather than completely remove them in that timeframe. The greatest reductions are expected in low-wage, routine jobs: office support roles may continue to contract by large percentages, customer service roles could decline significantly (as AI chatbots handle inquiries), and food service jobs might drop with the spread of self-service and automation. They estimate an additional 12 million U.S. workers may need to change occupations by 2030 due to these shifts. On the flip side, the demand for tech workers (AI developers, engineers), healthcare providers, and jobs in climate/infrastructure will grow, potentially offsetting losses. Notably, federal investments like the infrastructure bill and clean energy programs are creating jobs that AI cannot fill (e.g. construction labor, wind turbine technicians). So for economic stability, it will be crucial that the new job creation in emerging sectors keeps pace with the losses in automating sectors. If managed well, the U.S. could see a rebalancing where workers transition into higher-skilled, higher-paying jobs — McKinsey suggests the economy may “reweight toward higher-wage jobs” as automation takes over lower-wage work. But this optimistic scenario hinges on massive retraining efforts.
Employment in 2025 and beyond will also depend on education and re-skilling. One reason many experts aren’t predicting 30% unemployment is that the workforce and businesses can adapt given time. For example, although AI could do a quarter of current work tasks, new tasks and jobs will emerge for humans. Goldman Sachs economists, who warned that generative AI might put tens of millions of jobs at risk in the U.S. and Europe, also noted that historically, technology creates new occupations that often offset the losses. They pointed out that while up to one-fourth of work tasks might be eliminated, new processes and efficiencies could spur job growth elsewhere — and critically, productivity gains from AI could boost economic growth (Goldman estimated AI could raise global GDP by 7% over time). This potential productivity boom could generate wealth to invest in new industries. In other words, AI could expand the economic pie, allowing society to afford more jobs in areas that humans excel at (creative endeavors, complex problem-solving, personal services that require empathy). Indeed, optimists like JPMorgan’s CEO Jamie Dimon suggest technology advances will improve living standards and even shorten the workweek in the long run (“your children…probably [will] be working three-and-a-half days a week” thanks to AI-driven productivity). Such outcomes are possible if productivity gains translate into higher incomes, more leisure, and new kinds of demand (for new products, experiences, etc., that create jobs).
However, in the short term, turbulence is likely. Economic stability could be tested if AI adoption outpaces the ability of workers to transition. A key concern is mismatch: the jobs being created (AI specialists, data scientists, care workers) may require very different skills or pay lower wages than the jobs being lost (e.g. a displaced factory worker might struggle to shift to a software developer role, or a displaced office assistant might only find work in lower-paid gig jobs initially). This could lead to temporary unemployment spikes or under-employment. Some analysts caution that without intervention, we could see greater inequality — those with AI-related skills command high salaries, while those without are pushed into lower-paying gig work. Social safety nets and training programs will be critical to maintain stability. If handled poorly, widespread displacement could reduce consumer spending and confidence, affecting economic growth. But if handled well — with strong upskilling pipelines and job matching — the economy might achieve a smooth transition where productivity gains from AI actually fuel more employment (people have more disposable income to spend on services provided by humans, etc.).
Most forecasts do not foresee AI causing Great Depression–level joblessness. For instance, a study by the OECD found no clear evidence that AI is driving mass unemployment yet, though it is changing the nature of work. And as noted, U.S. unemployment as of late 2024 remains historically low (~4%) even after a year of heavy tech layoffs and initial AI deployments. This resilience gives some hope that the economy can absorb AI’s shocks as it has other technological revolutions. By 2025, we expect moderate impacts: certain job categories shrinking faster, productivity tick-ups in AI-adopting firms, and a continued tight overall labor market if the economy avoids recession. Beyond 2025, toward 2030, the impacts will amplify — making this next five-year period crucial for laying the groundwork (through education, policy, business innovation) for an AI-integrated workforce.
Government Policies and Regulatory Responses
Policymakers have begun grappling with the implications of AI on employment. The U.S. government’s approach so far has been to encourage innovation in AI while mitigating potential harms to workers through guidelines and existing laws. Unlike some European countries, the U.S. has not contemplated banning AI deployments or slowing automation via heavy regulation; instead, it is focusing on strategies like worker re-training, AI ethics, and updating labor standards.
One significant step is the Department of Labor’s AI Best Practices framework released in October 2024. This is a comprehensive roadmap intended to ensure AI is used in ways that “improve job quality and safeguard workers’ rights and well-being,” as Acting Secretary Julie Su described. The guidance calls on employers to involve workers in AI implementation, to be transparent, and to use AI to enhance (not degrade) jobs. Labor leaders, like the AFL-CIO president, have praised this effort, emphasizing that workers (through unions) should have a say in how technology changes their work, so that AI augments rather than replaces their roles. The Biden Administration also issued an Executive Order on AI in late 2023 that, among many provisions, highlighted the need for a commitment to supporting America’s workers in an AI-driven economy. This has translated into initiatives for federal agencies to develop training programs and principles for the “responsible use of AI” in hiring and workplace management. For example, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and Department of Labor have warned employers that AI hiring tools must comply with anti-discrimination laws and are developing tools to help employers audit AI systems for bias. These steps indicate a regulatory focus on how AI is used (fairly and ethically), rather than restricting whether it can be used.
Workforce development policies are also being ramped up. The federal government has expanded apprenticeships and grants for tech education. In 2022, the CHIPS and Science Act not only invested in semiconductor manufacturing but also authorized funding for STEM workforce training to fill those new tech jobs. There’s recognition that a robust response to AI displacement is funding re-skilling programs. Congress and states have been exploring policies like: tuition support for mid-career workers to learn new skills, incentives for companies that upskill their employees, and public-private partnerships to train workers in AI, data analysis, and other in-demand fields. For instance, the Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) program, historically for workers displaced by globalization, could be adapted for those displaced by automation. While no major new federal program specifically for “AI job displacement” exists yet, think tanks and commissions are actively studying proposals such as wage insurance (to help workers who must take lower-paying jobs during transitions) or even a federal job guarantee in extreme scenarios. So far, the policy response has been more preparatory than reactive, since the employment effects of AI are still emerging. But we can expect more concrete programs if evidence of AI-driven unemployment grows.
Another arena of policy response is the gig economy and labor law. With more workers moving to freelance or gig roles, there’s pressure to update labor protections. A prominent example is California’s efforts: the state passed AB5 in 2019 to classify many gig workers as employees (with benefits), but companies fought back with Proposition 22 in 2020. In 2024, the California Supreme Court upheld Prop 22, meaning app-based drivers and delivery workers in California remain independent contractors under that law (albeit with some limited benefits). This ongoing tug-of-war highlights how regulators are seeking to balance the flexibility of gig work with basic worker protections. Other states and the federal government are closely watching. The U.S. Department of Labor has proposed stricter rules on classifying workers as contractors versus employees, aiming to prevent misclassification that deprives workers of benefits.
However, there’s no consensus yet — the gig work issue is hotly debated. We might see new legislation or standards that ensure gig workers have access to protections like minimum earnings, insurance, or collective bargaining rights without fully adopting employee status. Indeed, the National Labor Relations Board and some city governments have taken steps to give gig workers more voice (for example, Seattle granted collective bargaining rights to ride-share drivers). These policies are a direct response to the rise of alternative work arrangements in the AI/platform economy. They will influence how sustainable gig and freelance work is as a career path, and how much bargaining power gig workers have when platform algorithms (a form of AI) dictate their work and pay.
Economic indicators are also being tracked and used to guide policy. The government monitors metrics like the unemployment rate, labor force participation, job openings (JOLTS), and productivity growth to gauge the impact of technology. If, for instance, unemployment started to climb sharply due to automation, that would prompt emergency measures (such as extended unemployment benefits or public works programs). So far, as noted, unemployment remains low, but productivity data has been intriguing — after a slump in the 2010s, analysts are watching for an AI-driven productivity uptick in the late 2020s which could raise GDP growth and wages. The Federal Reserve, in setting interest rates, also considers labor market tightness. Should AI significantly reduce the need for workers in certain sectors, it could alleviate wage inflation pressure, influencing Fed policy. However, if AI leads to higher structural unemployment, the Fed and Congress might need to coordinate on stimulus or job creation programs.
Regulatory foresight is another aspect: agencies are studying how to update laws like antitrust (if AI leads to winner-takes-all markets), intellectual property (for AI-generated content), and education policy (to incorporate AI training in schools). For example, the White House OSTP (Office of Science and Technology Policy) released a Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights in 2022, which though non-binding, outlines principles such as “data privacy” and “notice and explanation” that indirectly support workers — e.g., workers should know if an AI system is making decisions about them (hiring, firing, pay) and be protected from its inaccuracies or biases. We may see regulations requiring human oversight of AI decisions in employment to prevent unjust automated firings or algorithmic discrimination in hiring. Already, New York City implemented a law in 2023 requiring bias audits for AI hiring tools, a first-of-its-kind regulation in the employment domain.
Finally, some thought leaders and politicians have floated bolder ideas for the long term: for instance, a “robot tax” — taxing companies for jobs lost to AI/automation and using the revenue to fund retraining or universal basic income. While the U.S. has not enacted such a tax, it’s been seriously discussed: Bill Gates famously suggested a robot tax to slow down automation and finance support for displaced workers. The idea is controversial (critics say it might discourage innovation or be hard to implement), but it reflects the creative policies under consideration to address AI’s impact on society. Universal Basic Income (UBI) trials have also been conducted in some U.S. cities (and countries in Europe) as a potential cushion for a future where job stability is lower. Though not yet mainstream policy, the concept gained attention during Andrew Yang’s 2020 presidential campaign, explicitly citing automation as a reason for UBI.
In summary, the government’s response to AI-driven employment changes is evolving on multiple fronts: issuing best-practice guidelines to employers, investing in worker training, updating gig economy laws, and studying larger interventions. The overarching aim is to ensure that the workforce can benefit from AI — through higher-quality jobs and not just higher productivity for companies. It’s a delicate balance: over-regulation could stifle the innovation that creates new jobs, but under-preparation could lead to social and economic disruption if job losses mount. Policymakers are increasingly aware that now is the time to prepare. As one example of proactive thinking, the White House Council of Economic Advisors has argued that “AI need not lead to unemployment, if we make the right investments in education and training” (paraphrasing their 2023 report). Thus, expect more initiatives like tech apprenticeship expansions, tax credits for companies that retrain workers, and maybe even requirements for companies to give advance notice or severance for AI-driven layoffs. Economic indicators will guide these policies — if productivity soars and growth is strong, it’s a sign AI is boosting the economy (and resources can be allocated to help those left behind); if productivity doesn’t translate into broad gains, that will increase pressure for policies ensuring the benefits of AI are shared (through wages or public programs).
Final Inputs
The coming years will be pivotal in defining the future of work in an AI-driven U.S. economy. In the near term, we expect to see continued job churn: companies will automate tasks and streamline headcounts in certain roles, even as demand grows for workers in AI development, healthcare, green energy, and other fields. Fears of a recession and the allure of efficiency mean that corporate America will likely remain cautious on hiring, focusing on productivity — and AI is a key tool in that quest. Meanwhile, the American workforce is adapting by embracing flexibility: millions are taking up gig work, independent consulting, or online entrepreneurship, creating a more dynamic but also less secure labor market.
By 2025, AI will be deeply embedded in many jobs, and its presence will be felt — from chatbots handling customer calls to algorithms assisting doctors. The net effect on employment through 2025 is expected to be mixed: certain jobs will be lost to AI, but overall unemployment might remain moderate as the economy adjusts and new opportunities arise. Looking further to 2030 and beyond, AI’s impact could be more profound, potentially automating a substantial share of work activities. Yet expert forecasts and historical precedent suggest that with the right transitions, this need not spell economic disaster. Global and national projections generally foresee AI as a transformative force that, while displacing millions of jobs, will also generate millions of new ones. The key challenges will be managing the transition period — keeping workers employed and retrained, updating policies to protect those in non-traditional roles, and maintaining economic demand.
Government and policy interventions will play a crucial role in smoothing this transition. Ensuring accessible re-skilling programs, encouraging responsible AI adoption (that augments workers rather than purely replaces them), and modernizing labor laws for the gig/AI era will all contribute to economic stability. Early steps like the Department of Labor’s AI Best Practices and state-level gig worker laws are the first of many likely actions. Continuous dialogue between the tech industry, policymakers, educators, and worker representatives will be needed to steer the future of work towards positive outcomes. As the World Economic Forum notes, the jobs of the future will require new skills, and a concerted effort in upskilling and education is paramount.
The U.S. is entering a period of significant workforce transformation. AI is both a threat and an opportunity: it threatens certain jobs with redundancy, yet it offers the opportunity to elevate productivity, create new industries, and even improve work-life balance if harnessed correctly. The rise of the gig and creator economies shows the workforce is proactively reshaping itself, but also raises questions about security and equity. By 2025 and beyond, we will likely witness a more AI-integrated economy that still relies on human talent — albeit with different skills and in different arrangements than today. The hope, backed by many economic studies, is that AI can lead to higher overall prosperity, if society can navigate the interim pains. Vigilant policy support, innovative business leadership, and worker resilience will together determine whether the “AI revolution” becomes a net positive for American workers or exacerbates challenges. The preceding attempts to lay out the current trends and expert projections as a mere foundation; the real outcome will depend on decisions made in the next few years, making this an incredibly important area for continued research and action.
Sam Leigh is the CEO and Managing Partner at iA, writing about technology, innovation, and the future of culture for The Weekend Read. Book a 1:1 with Sam Here!
References
Challenger, Gray & Christmas, Inc. (2024). Top layoff reasons in 2024. Challengergray.com. Retrieved from https://www.challengergray.com
Department of Labor. (2024). AI Best Practices: Remarks by Acting Secretary Julie Su. U.S. Department of Labor. Retrieved from https://www.dol.gov
Exploding Topics. (2024). CEO expectations for AI-driven job cuts: PwC survey findings. Explodingtopics.com. Retrieved from https://explodingtopics.com
Goldman Sachs. (2024). AI’s impact on jobs and tasks at risk. People Matters. Retrieved from https://anz.peoplemattersglobal.com
McKinsey & Company. (2024). The future of work: Automation by 2030 and necessary job transitions. McKinsey.com. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com
People Matters. (2024). Companies investing heavily in AI while simultaneously cutting staff. Retrieved from https://anz.peoplemattersglobal.com
ResumeBuilder. (2024). Business leader survey on AI layoffs in the U.S. Resumebuilder.com. Retrieved from https://resumebuilder.com
Reuters. (2024). Labor market resilience despite high-profile layoffs. Reuters.com. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com
Staffing Industry Analysts. (2024). Tech layoffs driven by AI and economic factors. OpenTools. Retrieved from https://opentools.ai
Tebra. (2024). Healthcare survey on AI integration and job cuts. Tebra.com. Retrieved from https://tebra.com
Upwork. (2023). Freelance economy statistics 2023: Workforce participation and economic impact. Upwork.com. Retrieved from https://upwork.com
World Economic Forum. (2024). The future of jobs report 2025: Projections on job displacement and creation. Weforum.org. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org
WorkLife. (2024). Gig economy growth and workforce projections. Worklife.news. Retrieved from https://worklife.news
Bobsguide. (2024). Bloomberg Intelligence report on AI impact in banking jobs. Retrieved from https://bobsguide.com
CalMatters. (2024). California Proposition 22: Gig workers’ status upheld. Calmatters.org. Retrieved from https://calmatters.org
Kommentare